Another installment in our ongoing series, deep thoughts from our chat logs.
#2: that cartoon is kinda sad.
#1: how so? I suppose it’s like saying tis better to have loved and lost than never have loved at all, which is debatable.
#2: it seems like it’s saying the man could have been more, could have been great, but instead he drinks beer and watches TV. I like to stay home.
#1: oh, I think they’re saying that man is a critic
not that there’s anything wrong with staying home and drinking beer and being an accountant
but that if you do that, you shouldn’t criticize people who do more stuffs. Personally I am a big proponent of temperature control. Climbing mountains seems dumb
#2: but being a critic is important too; otherwise how would we know which books are crap? I mean, I have some problems with professional critics, but sometimes somebody needs to say that the emperor has no clothes.
#1: point taken. ok, you win. The context I’d seen it offered in was “if you don’t get rejected from time to time you’re not aiming high enough” which is a totally valid suggestion, especially for women. But you are right, it doesn’t fit that at all
#2: I agree that if you don’t get rejected you aren’t aiming high enough. That part is right. Making it sad to be an accountant is wrong.
being an accountant is kind of sad
except for people who like that sort of thing
#2: maybe they like it though!
maybe it’s like solving a big puzzle for them
#1: but being a mountain climber is also pretty sad. Except for people who like that sort of thing. Like, what’s the point?
#2: mountain climbers are kinda dickwads, from the books I’ve read
#1: at least accountants provide value
#1: except the ones who work for arthur anderson or enron
those provided negative value<
#2: went over to the dark side
So… who do you agree with? Are we misreading (or reading too much into) a cartoon?