While watching old vlogbrothers videos, I found out they have a campaign to “read the book first“, that is you should read the book before watching the movie.
The book is (almost always) better than the movie… I think everyone can agree on that. It’s an almost universal truth with only enough exceptions that they prove the rule.
Because most people prefer pleasure to increase over time rather than decrease, it makes sense to save the best for last. Watch the movie. Then read the book.
What about spoilers? I’m the kind of person who doesn’t like surprises, so I’m fine with spoilers. I love wikipedia so much because I can read plot synopses before deciding to watch a show. If you really love to be surprised, then yeah, you should probably read the book first, though keep in mind that the movie often deviates substantially from the book for cinematic reasons, so you might not be as spoilered as you think you are.
#2 says: The correct answer is: read the book first and watch the movie never. The movie is NEVER as good as what’s in my head when I read! It’s not worth it.
There, solved that for ya.
#1 disagrees. CASE IN POINT: The Princess Bride. YES, the book is better, but the movie is AMAZEBALLS. Watch the movie first, then cherish the book. Similarly, Captain Blood. Delightful movie with Errol Flynn and Olivia DeHaviland. Even better book (free on kindle!). Both are worth the experience. And then there are fantastic adaptations, think Clueless based on Emma. Same plot, different experiences.
Obviously some movies suck and aren’t worth watching ever even though the book is good (I’m looking at you, Mrs. Frisby and the Rats of Nimh). But there are a lot of excellent movies adapted from excellent books. Experience both!
What about you? Which first?